By Joseph Lister Nyaringo
As Kenya approaches its next general election
in August 2027, the opposition faces a glaring reality: dissatisfaction with
President William Ruto is not enough to secure victory. Elections are not won
by protest alone; they require organisation, discipline, resources, and a
compelling alternative vision. For opposition parties, success demands more
than critique—it requires strategic planning, tactical execution, and
preparation undertaken years in advance.
The first and most critical challenge for the
opposition is unity. Fragmentation has historically been its greatest weakness.
In 1992, a divided opposition handed the late President Daniel Moi another term
despite widespread unpopularity. Today, the so-called loyal opposition figures,
such as former Vice President Stephen Kalonzo Musyoka, former Deputy President
Rigathi Gachagua, former Interior Cabinet Secretary Dr Fred Matiang’i, and
former Chief Justice David Maraga, have repeatedly pledged to unite behind a
single candidate. Yet history warns that when it comes to agreeing on
leadership, internal squabbles often surface, risking fragmentation and giving
the incumbent a decisive advantage.
Early unity, achieved through transparent
mechanisms such as joint primaries or independent arbitration, would allow the
opposition to campaign as a coherent national force, reduce internal sabotage,
prevent mixed messaging, and signal seriousness about governance rather than
merely contesting power.
Closely linked is the need for a coherent
economic programme. Many Kenyans struggle with high living costs, unemployment,
and taxation pressures. Opposition rhetoric too often stops at criticism
without offering credible alternatives. To persuade voters, opposition parties
must present practical, costed proposals addressing bread-and-butter issues
such as taxation, debt management, job creation, food security, and support for
small businesses. This programme should be understandable to ordinary citizens,
with clear targets for the first 100 days of government. Without such clarity,
calls for change risk appearing emotional rather than compelling.
Beyond policy, opposition parties must
cultivate a genuinely national coalition. Kenyan elections are won through
alliances that cut across regions, communities, and socioeconomic lines.
Relying solely on historical strongholds or urban discontent will not suffice.
The opposition must actively engage voters in regions where the ruling party
remains dominant, including parts of the Rift Valley, Mount Kenya, and the
Coast. Sustained engagement, transparent power-sharing, and genuine inclusion
of grassroots leaders are essential. Such inclusivity demonstrates commitment
to national unity rather than transactional politics.
Grassroots organisation and electoral
preparedness are equally crucial. Campaign rallies and social media activism
alone do not secure victory. The opposition must establish strong ward-level
and polling-station structures capable of mobilising voters, protecting
ballots, and monitoring results. Recruiting and training agents for every
polling station, setting up parallel tallying systems, and boosting voter
registration and turnout, especially among young and first-time voters, are
fundamental. Malpractice complaints carry little weight without organisational
evidence to support them.
Internal discipline and democratic
credibility are further determinants of success. Public infighting,
contradictory statements, and leadership disputes erode confidence. Opposition
parties must enforce message discipline, resolve disagreements internally, and
uphold ethical standards visibly. Leadership renewal elevating competent young
leaders, women, and technocrats broadens appeal and counters perceptions of
recycled politics. A leadership team reflecting Kenya’s demographic and
professional diversity strengthens the opposition’s claim to represent the
future.
Even if these measures are implemented, the
incumbent retains formidable advantages. Ruto’s political strength is rooted in
decades of careful preparation. From his early days in the KANU youth wing to
roles as MP, Cabinet Minister, Deputy President, and now President, he has
built disciplined networks across communities, business, churches, and regional
power brokers. These structures allow him to mobilise efficiently, respond
swiftly to threats, and maintain loyalty-a feat that opposition coalitions often
struggle to replicate.
Financial resources amplify these advantages.
Kenyan elections are among the most expensive on the continent, requiring
funding for mobilisation, logistics, media campaigns, and legal preparedness.
Ruto’s financial networks, cultivated over years, provide both funding and
operational capacity. Opposition alliances, often cobbled together late,
struggle to match this level of preparedness. In politics, stamina matters, and
financial muscle buys endurance.
Incumbency itself confers further power. Ruto
commands visibility, authority, and institutional reach that challengers cannot
replicate. Development projects, official tours, and state engagements double
as political capital, reinforcing presence nationwide. He also sets the
national agenda, forcing opponents into a reactive posture. Tactical agility is
another strength: his “hustler nation” narrative in 2022 transformed economic
grievances into an emotionally resonant political brand. By consistently framing
programmes such as housing, agriculture, and digital innovation as part of a
long-term vision, he projects consistency that inspires voter confidence.
Ruto’s moral and loyalty narratives also
fortify his appeal. Allies are rewarded, reinforcing discipline and deterring
defection, while his visible religiosity and invocation of faith resonate in a
deeply religious society. These elements create both practical loyalty and
moral legitimacy among supporters.
Finally, opposition weaknesses further
strengthen Ruto’s position. Fragmentation, personality clashes, and reliance on
protest rather than proposition leave challengers vulnerable. To mount a
credible challenge, the opposition must not only unify, articulate a coherent
programme, and mobilise grassroots support, but also match his organisational
depth, financial resources, tactical sophistication, and moral narrative.
Yet none of this makes Ruto invincible. It
does, however, explain why defeating him is extraordinarily difficult. For
opposition parties, passion alone will not suffice. Understanding and
countering the machinery Ruto has meticulously built over decades is the first
step toward mounting a credible challenge. Until then, he remains not just a
competitor, but the benchmark against which all contenders must measure
themselves.
Kenyan voters, while vocal about
unemployment, high living costs, and government shortcomings, often respond to
immediate incentives and persuasive narratives rather than historical
performance. Despite criticisms of corruption, nepotism, and heavy-handed
crackdowns such as during last year’s Gen Z demonstrations, these factors
rarely dominate electoral outcomes. The reality is that monetary enticements
and effective mobilisation often outweigh protest, further cementing Ruto’s
position.
Lister Nyaringo is a Kenyan based in Washington State,
United States
No comments:
Post a Comment